I've said it before and I'll say it again, the media has one heck of a way of trying to explain things to John Q Public, that even they don't fully understand.
And I'm sure this is the same in many professions, but of course I see it all the time when the media is reporting on something aviation related.
Take this article about an unfortunate incident where an Air Canada Jazz pilot left the cockpit to use the washroom and then unfortunately, couldn't get back in as the door had jammed!
Pilot locked out of Jazz cabin mid-flight
Here's a couple of brief excerpts I'll comment on:
...the pilot on Flight 8475 apparently left the cockpit to use the washroom at the back of the plane, leaving the flight's First Officer in control of the plane.
However when the pilot returned, the door was apparently stuck -- or locked -- and the pilot was unable to return into the cockpit.
Eventually, the crew forced the door open by taking the door off its hinges completely, and the pilot safely landed the plane -- although in the event that the pilot was unable to access the cockpit, the First Officer is trained to land the aircraft.
Perhaps some of you can spot out the poor choice of words in this article, but I'm sure most of you are none the wiser thanks to a poor understanding of what really goes on in the cockpit and just general misconception which has likely been aided along thanks to the awesome job the media usually does.
What I'm trying to point at here, is that there are TWO PILOTS on board the aircraft. A Captain and a First Officer. While both are fully trained on the aircraft, the Captain is also referred to in most cases as the "Pilot in Command". Meaning he usually has more experience and the general flight is under his command. The First Officer is then referred to as the "Second in Command". Both of the pilots fly the airplane, and divide up the duties in the cockpit which alternate on each flight leg. So for a 2 flight day, the Captain would fly the aircraft with the assistance of the First Officer working the radios, calling out pertinent flight information and handling other duties such as physically retracting the landing gear and moving the flap position levers once called for by the other pilot. This would then reverse for the next flight. The First Officer would then fly the next leg with the assistance of the Captain performing the other duties.
The point I'm getting at is that it is a shared cockpit. The First Officer (Co-pilot as some refer to it) does not just sit there and assist, but not fly the airplane. It would be an extremely boring job to just sit there and never fly the airplane! They maintain their same seat positions in most instances (Captain on the left and First Officer on the right) but this changes nothing, as almost all aircraft are fully controllable from either seat.
So as you can see it irks me when I read these reports from the media always referring to the co-pilot or First Officer as back ups and helpers and rarely as what their real job is.. a PILOT. So to read in this article that in the event that Captain could not return to the cockpit the First Officer was trained to land the airplane.. yeesh. Of course he/she can land the damn airplane, he/she's a freaking pilot! Would you like an unqualified individual up in the cockpit up there just helping one pilot out? Let's hold a lottery at the beginning of each flight for a "pilot helper" and just pick a passenger to sit up front. Grrrr.. media.
Another recent report was about the Air France A340 that crashed off the runway in Toronto. The newspaper had written a comment which had basically said: 'It has not been ascertained as to why the First Officer was flying the aircraft, and not the more experienced Captain'. Hell, I'll tell you right now, because it was the First Officer's leg to fly! Now obviously if the Captain had deemed it in his best interest to take control of the aircraft, then it is his right at any time as he is in the ultimate command of the aircraft. But if the First Officer was flying, this is not an uncommon occurrence.
And I'm sure aviation is not the only industry in which this occurs, but of course I read reports everyday related to my field of expertise as I'm sure most of you do too. So it pains me when I read the ignorance being reported, and the general public is lead to believe it is the real deal.










